Legal Opinion

Celanese Corp. & Consolidated Subsidiaries v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 25, 1985No. 142-82TPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER SPECIFYING FACTS NOT IN CONTROVERSY

PHILIP R. MILLER, Judge.

The substantive question at issue is whether or not Celanese Corporation may deduct $58,364,636 as a bad debt loss, ordinary loss or business expense on its 1969 *46income tax return, as the result of having paid that sum in satisfaction of its guarantees of the debts of SIACE, an Italian subsidiary, during that year.

Defendant moved for summary judgment on the legal contention that § 166 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 was the only provision under which plaintiff could deduct its loss and,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. SFM Corp. v. Sundstrand Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  3. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. United States Camo Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1956
  4. United States v. Copacabana, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  5. Woodruff Ex Rel. Moore v. LavineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API