Legal Opinion

Burt v. Missouri Pac. R.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided January 22, 1924No. 6466PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRIEB'ER, District Judge.

-The plaintiff instituted this action against the defendant railroad company and two of its employees, one the engineer and the other the fireman of the train which, it is alleged, caused the death of the plaintiff’s intestate. The complaint charged that the injury, from which death resulted to the intestate, was caused by the negligence of the defendants. It is alleged that, while the deceased was upon the trade of said railroad in the act of crossing the same, at a public crossing, in the town of Beebe, Ark., he was struck by a train, operated by the railroad…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. WillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Chi., RI & Pac. Ry. v. DowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. ForemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. Ralls v. MittlesteadtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Shane v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1954
  4. Gilbow v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Harrod v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API