Legal Opinion

Novick v. Myers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2001No. SC S48765PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this ballot title review proceeding, petitioner challenges all four aspects (i.e., the caption, the “yes” and “no” vote result statements, and the summary) of the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for a proposed initiative measure that the Secretary of State has denominated as Initiative Petition 72 (2002). We review the Attorney General’s certified ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with the requirements of ORS 250.035. See ORS 250.085(5) (setting out standard of review).

The proposed measure would amend the present wording of Article IV, section 1,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. Caleb v. BeesleyOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Kane v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Novick v. Myers (Certification)Oregon Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API