Legal Opinion

Fisher v. City of Ottawa

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 16, 1972No. 72-10PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

The appellants, Hart Fisher and Gerald Sesto, plaintiffs below and hereinafter referred to as such, filed a suit for a declaratory judgment in the circuit court of La Salle County. The suit was in the nature of a class action brought on behalf of themselves and all other past and present inhabitants, consumers, users and rate payers for the services provided by the combined waterworks and sewage system of the city of Ottawa, La Salle County, Illinois, who have paid penalties pursuant to section 2 of an ordinance of the city of Ottawa. This ordinance provided for a 10% penalty charge on all…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illinois Glass Co. v. Chicago Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Peoples Store of Roseland v. McKibbinIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Newberry Library v. Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Richardson Lubricating Co. v. KinneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  5. American Brewing Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Prime Cable of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. Corbett v. Devon BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Russell v. Hertz Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. United Private Detective & Security Ass'n v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API