Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Fay Improvement Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 2, 1955No. Civ. 16252PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

The plaintiffs brought this action against the several defendants for an injunction to compel the removal of a public improvement, and for damages. The trial court granted plaintiffs, as against all defendants, both an injunction and damages. Defendants appeal.

Plaintiffs are the owners of separate parcels of real property, that, prior to January of 1950, abutted on the easterly side of an unpaved unimproved dead end street known as Knox Street in San Francisco. This street ran in a general north-south direction, intersecting at its southern end with Felton Street, the northern end being a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sheffet v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Leppo v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Blau v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Hill v. WratherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Steiger v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API