Reeves v. F. Miller & Sons, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
COOKS, Judge.
liThe Plaintiff appeals a jury verdict finding he had not proven by a preponderance of the evidence that he was a Jones Act seaman. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff, Orie Reeves, Jr., began his employment with Defendant, F. Miller and Sons, Inc., in 1992. Defendant is a company involved in general construction, including construction of buildings, bridges, wharfs, etc. Plaintiff worked as a pile driver/operator who performed various construction duties. On March 19, 2003, Plaintiff alleged he injured himself while engaged in the course…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDermott International, Inc. v. WilanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Harbor Tug & Barge Co. v. PapaiSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Jerome D. Wallace v. Oceaneering International, Defendant-Appellant-Appellee, and Cities Service Company v. Zapata Offshore Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Becker v. Tidewater, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dize v. Ass'n of Maryland PilotsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012