Legal Opinion
People v. Borja
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 23, 2002No. D038113PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
The People appeal a nunc pro tunc order to June 1994 reducing the sentence imposed on Roberto Burgos Borja as a condition of probation from 365 to 364 days. The People contend the court acted in excess of jurisdiction because Borja’s probation term had expired nearly two years earlier, there was no clerical mistake justifying a nunc pro tunc order, Borja did not raise grounds justifying the modification, and the order interfered with another order made a year earlier. We reverse.
Facts
In May 1994 Borja was charged with driving under the influence, driving while having a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
- Jose A. Bazan-Reyes, Wincenty Z. MacIasowicz and Arnoldo Gomez-Vela v. Immigration and Naturalization Service and John D. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- People v. DouglasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Johnson & Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. SeguraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Uriel Gonzalez v. Stuart ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- People v. TurrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. Hyung Joon KimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.