State v. Mailey, Unpublished Decision (6-30-2006)

DECISION.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Christopher Mailey challenges the trial court's denial of his motion to dismiss. Mailey maintains that the state violated R.C. 2945.71, Ohio's speedy-trial statute, and that he is entitled to have this appeal sustained and his conviction set aside.

{¶ 2} Mailey's argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss by (1) dating a previously undated journal entry nunc pro tunc, and (2) retroactively extending the speedy-trial time under R.C. 2945.72(H). Mailey is incorrect.

{¶ 3} The trial court nunc pro tunc entered a date for the previously…