Legal Opinion

Winfield v. CIGNA COMPANIES

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1995No. S-93-870PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanphier, J.

Plaintiff-appellee, David John Winfield, initiated this action in the county court for Buffalo County to obtain medical expense benefits under an insurance contract issued by defendant-appellant, Life Insurance Company of North America (LINA). Pursuant to a motion for summary judgment filed by LINA, the county court held that the terms of the insurance contract were unambiguous. The insurance contract states that “treatment” must begin within 60 days of an injury. Winfield received only massages within 60 days. At issue is the policy definition of “treatment.” The county court held that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Healy v. LangdonNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Union Ins. Co. v. Land and Sky, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Cimino v. FirsTier Bank, NANebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Curtis O. Griess & Sons, Inc. v. Farm Bureau InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. John Markel Ford, Inc. v. Auto-Owners InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Daehnke v. Nebraska Department of Social ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Boettcher v. BalkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Moller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Estate of Stine v. Chambanco, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API