Legal Opinion

John Markel Ford, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1996No. S-94-137PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff-appellant, John Markel Ford, Inc., alleges that defendant-appellee, Auto-Owners Insurance Company, breached the parties’ contract of insurance. The district court sustained the motion for summary judgment filed by Auto-Owners, thereby dismissing Markel Ford’s action. Markel Ford then appealed to the Nebraska Court of Appeals, asserting, in summary, that the district court erred in (1) determining as a matter of law that the contract did not obligate Auto-Owners to either defend or indemnify Markel Ford in a suit brought against it by the State of Iowa, (2) determining…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ruder & Finn Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Ella Tower v. Paralee Moss, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Home Construction Company of Mobile, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Allstate Insurance v. NovakNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Chatton v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. HemenwayNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Henderson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Gordon v. ConnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Roskop Dairy v. GEA Farm Tech.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Radecki v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API