Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1915No. 4552PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, Woodward County; . James W. Steen, Judge. Action by G. B. Armstrong-against B. Rowley Thomas and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of

RITTENHOUSE, G.

On July 22, 1912, G. B. Armstrong instituted an action of replevin in the. district court of Woodward county to recover possession of certain personal property, used in connection with the publication of the Woodward News-Bulletin, claiming the right of possession by virtue of a chattel mortgage on an undivided half interest in the plant, presses, type, stock, and outfit of said Woodward News-Bulletin, subject to two mortgages, one for $500. in favor of W. E. Bolton, and the other for $500 in favor of Central Exchange Bank. The writ df replevin was returned “Not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. State v. Union National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State v. Jacksonville, Pensacola & Mobile RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1875
  4. Bowman v. HazenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Kreling v. KrelingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burrus Mill & Elevator Co. v. Kingfisher CollegeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API