Legal Opinion

Kreling v. Kreling

California Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1897No. S. F. No. 763PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from an order of tbe Superior Court of tbe City and County of San Francisco appointing a receiver. James M. Troutt, Judge. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion of tbe court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The plaintiff seeks by this action to compel the defendant to satisfy an obligation made by her intestate to the Anglo-Californian Bank, and on November 9, 1895, the superior court rendered its judgment directing the defendant to discharge within a specified time certain indebtedness upon two promissory notes held by that bank, upon which a claim had been made by it against the estate of her intestate (and which by an agreement between her and the defendant he had agreed to assume and to release the said estate therefrom); and that in default thereof a certain piece of real property described…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Staples v. MayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. First Trust & Savings Bank of Billings v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Bowman v. HazenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Ex Rel. Nenzel v. District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Shannon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API