Legal Opinion
Cummins v. McIntosh
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 25, 2004No. 49A02-0309-CV-786PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOK, Chief Judge.
Case Summary
Appellant-plaintiff Joe M. Cummins appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee-defendant Brent R. MeIntosh, M.D. We remand.
Issue
The dispositive issue is whether the master commissioner's findings leading to the trial court's judgment comply with Indiana Code Section 33-5.1-2-11(e).
Facts and Procedural History
The facts most favorable to Cummins as the nonmoving party reveal that he fractured his right femur while deer hunting in October 1992. McIntosh repaired his femur with an intermedullary nail manufactured by Smith & Nephew…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Betty Deckard v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Garage Doors of Indianapolis, Inc. v. MortonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Unincorporated Operating Division of Indiana Newspapers, Inc. v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- McIntosh v. CumminsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Creedon v. Asher Truck & Trailer, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cummins v. McIntoshIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Cummins v. McIntoshIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004