Legal Opinion
Cummins v. McIntosh
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 25, 2004No. 49A02-0309-CV-786Published
1Opinion of the Court
803 N.E.2d 1155 (2004)
Joe M. CUMMINS, Appellant-Plaintiff,
v.
Brent R. McINTOSH, M.D., Appellee-Defendant.
No. 49A02-0309-CV-786.
Court of Appeals of Indiana.
February 25, 2004.
Joseph J. Reiswerg, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant.
Steven J. Cohen, Zeigler Cohen & Koch, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellee.
OPINION
BROOK, Chief Judge.
Case Summary
Appellant-plaintiff Joe M. Cummins appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee-defendant Brent R. McIntosh, M.D. We remand.
Issue
The dispositive issue is whether the master commissioner's findings leading to the trial…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Betty Deckard v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Estate of Spry v. Greg & Ken, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Garage Doors of Indianapolis, Inc. v. MortonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Unincorporated Operating Division of Indiana Newspapers, Inc. v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Stemm v. Estate of DunlapIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.