United States v. Alfred Arnold Ameline
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
409 F.3d 1073
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Alfred Arnold AMELINE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-30326.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted En Banc March 24, 2005.
Filed June 1, 2005.
Michael R. Dreeben, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, Michael A. Rotker, Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Criminal Div., Appellate Sec., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Steven Hubacheck, Federal Defenders of San Diego, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Anthony R. Gallagher, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Great Falls, MT, for Amicus Curiae Federal…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Wardlaw; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Gould; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · O'Scannlain; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Bea.
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Damien ZepedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Adalberto Murguia-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Lorenzo EspinozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Michael TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017