Lammars v. Chicago Great Western Railroad
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Dubuque District Court. — Hon. Robert Bonson, Judge. Action to recover damages for injuries received by plaintiff while unloading rails from a car. The facts are more fully stated in the opinion. Trial to a jury. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
The undisputed, or established facts are, substantially: That plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant as a member of the section crew at Dyersville, Iowa. Frank Dodds was foreman of the crew. On the morning of plaintiff’s injury these men were working in the yard, at Dyersville when they received orders to unload steel rails from a car in a train which had just arrived. There were four men in the crew in addition to the foreman. Plaintiff’s work was along the section, track repairing, putting in rails, and work of that kind. He had nothing to do with running the train. The foreman had…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chicago, Kansas & Western Railroad v. PontiusSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. KinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Akeson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Daley v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Beleal ex rel. Beleal v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McElroy v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- McJimsey v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Lammars v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Kiesau v. BantzSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Kiesau v. BantzSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.