Legal Opinion

National Nassau Bank v. I. M. Ludington's Sons, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 20, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, I. M. Ludington’s Sons, Inc., from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 24th day of March, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court after a trial at the New York Trial Term'.

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, J.:

The defendant, hereinafter referred to as the contractor, had a contract with the State of New York for the improvement of a portion of the Erie canal, under contract No. 62, and sublet a portion of said work on September 28, 1910, to Gabriel Bros. Construction Company, hereinafter called the sub-contractor. The sub-contractor, being unable to complete its agreement with the contractor, on August 2, 1912, entered into an agreement in writing with it by which, among other things, it was agreed that the contract between them should be terminated and canceled as of July 1, 1912; that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Michigan Savings Bank v. MillarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Michigan Savings Bank v. . MillarNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Siebert v. DunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grossi v. Rialto Security Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. In re the Estate of ShanaburghNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  3. United States Trust Co. v. MendelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API