Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Shanaburgh
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided February 25, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, S.
This will was admitted to probate May 27, 1929. The executor was one of the legatees, and in November following assigned to one M. Arthur Lain all his right, title and interest as such legatee. Thereafter the executor was directed to account and, in the decree consequent thereupon, was surcharged a sms.11 amount. Later the original executor was removed and an administrator with the will annexed appointed. It appears upon this accounting that the original executor should be further surcharged, and the particular question is whether Lain, the assignee, acquired under his assignment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Deobold v. . OppermannNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- S. W. Scott & Co. v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Seibert v. . DunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Central Trust Co v. West India Improvement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Rogers v. . DeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Estate of GordonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938