Legal Opinion

United States Trust Co. v. Mendelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 6, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Martin, J.:

The plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $5,932.85 alleged to be due from defendants to the Rush Silk Manufacturing Company and by that company assigned to the plaintiff, to secure the payment of loans. The account arose out of a factoring agreement. Defendants made two payments on it to plaintiff. There is no dispute with reference to the amount of the account, but the defendants assert that they are entitled to offset, against it, certain unpaid trade acceptances which they hold against the Rush Silk Manufacturing Company, and which were given in payment for silk sold by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Michigan Savings Bank v. MillarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Michigan Savings Bank v. . MillarNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Siebert v. DunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  4. National Nassau Bank v. I. M. Ludington's Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grossi v. Rialto Security Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API