Legal Opinion

Hysell v. Steeling Coal & Manufacturing Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1899PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Mason County. Action by Sardine M. Hysell against the Sterling Coal & Manufacturing Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Dent, President:

In the case of Sardine M. Hysell, plaintiff, against the ■ Sterling Coal & Manufacturing Company, defendant, from the circuit court of Mason County, — being a writ of error from a judgment virtually in affirmance of the judgment of a justice on the verdict of a jury for the sum of two hundred and forty-seven dollars and fifty cents, — the defendant relies on two objections to the judgment, to-wi't: (1). The building was damaged through the negligence of ap-pellee’s employe and servant; (2) the contract was an entire one, and the work was incomplete when the building was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BurnsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Garrett v. RamseyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Gunn v. Ohio River R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Mapel v. JohnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Talbott v. West Virginia C. & P. R'y Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Intercity Realty Company v. GibsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Daugherty v. EllisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Coalmer v. BarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Moore v. StricklingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. State Road Commission v. OakesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API