Legal Opinion

Talbott v. West Virginia C. & P. R'y Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1896PublishedCited by 32 opinions

cited 33 W. Ya. 367, 268; Code, c. 131, s. 14; 42 W. Ya. 30, syl. pt. 4. cited 35 W. Ya. 438, etc.; 32 W. Ya. 436; 26 W. Ya. 455; 25 W. Ya. 570; 17 W. Ya. 190; 15 W. Ya. 628; 9 W. Va. 252, 270; 38 W. Ya. 694.

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Pkesident :

On a writ of error to a judgment rendered by the Circuit Court of Randolph county in an action for killing a horse on the track, on a demurrer to evidence.

*562Three grounds of error are assigned by defendant below, plaintiff in error, the railway company: “No. 1. The court below erred in rendering judgment for plaintiff on the demurrer to evidence. No. 2. In rendering judgment on the 10th day of May, 1894, with interest thereon from 80th day of January, 1894, the date of the conditional verdict. No. 3. In not setting aside the verdict as excessive.” We shall take up these…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Watts v. Norfolk & W. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hawker v. B. &. O. R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Mapel v. JohnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Ricketts v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. James G. v. CasertaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bond v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. O'Brien v. SnodgrassWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Hurxthal v. Boom Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Elk Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API