Legal Opinion

Hannan v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 9, 1923No. 23,191PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibeel, J.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

The plaintiff was driving a Ford northerly on Second avenue north in Minneapolis at 6 o’clock, a half hour after sunset, on October 18, 1920, and ran into the lowered safety gates of the defendant and was injured. The lights on her car were lighted and were in good condition. The accident was in a wholesale district. Traffic had substantially ceased. There were no distracting circumstances. The plaintiff was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lauson v. Town of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Heiden v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Woehrle v. Minnesota Transfer Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Stegner v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Wardner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Jacobs v. BellandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. First National Bank v. FoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Street v. RosebrockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API