Legal Opinion

Street v. Rosebrock

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 10, 1928No. 26,407PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Action to recover damages for alienation of the affections of plaintiff’s wife.

Plaintiff had a verdict at the trial. Defendants moved in the alternative for • judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. The trial court granted the motion for judgment, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

The one question presented by the appeal is whether or not there is any evidence reasonably tending to support the verdict; or, as otherwise stated, 'is the evidence practically conclusive against {he verdict? The rules as to when judgment notwithstanding the verdict may be granted have been so…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Klessig v. LeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. Hannan v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. FoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. Ruble v. RubleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API