Legal Opinion

Ikola v. Snoqualmie Falls Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1942No. 28556PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

This action was instituted by plaintiff to recover an amount alleged to be due for overtime work allowed under the provisions of the fair labor standards act passed by the Congress of the United States in the year 1938.

The complaint in paragraph one alleged the corporate capacity of the defendant and that it was engaged in interstate commerce within the meaning of the'fair labor standards act of 1938, and was engaged in the production of lumber in all its phases for purposes of shipment and sale from the state of Washington to the other sister states located in the United States.

Paragraph two…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Puget Mill Co. v. DuecyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. O'Neil v. Building Service Employees International Union, Local No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Isaacs v. HollandWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Hamp v. Universal Auto Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Matthews v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Park District v. Olympia Athletic Club, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Chas. H. Lilly Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ashenford v. L. Yukon & Sons Produce Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Hamilton v. Kiona-Benton Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Metropolitan Park District v. Olympia Athletic Club, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API