State v. Huckey
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, J.:
After hearing that probationer Randy L. Huckey had not reported to his supervisor for more than 2 months, the district court ruled Huckey was an absconder and declined to impose any intermediate sanctions as required by law when it revoked his probation. By legislative directive, intermediate sanctions are now the norm and the court must impose them unless the probationer has committed a new crime or absconded from supervision. The court may bypass the sanctions altogether if the court makes specific findings that public safety or the probationer’s own needs compel their avoidance.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. SkolautSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. StaffordSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- Fischer v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- State v. DaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- United States v. Alexander GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. DooleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- State v. AntwineCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- State v. BubeckCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- State v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
- State v. DarkisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.