Legal Opinion

Levin v. Suffrin

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1936No. 16307PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

This is a suit by an attorney for a fee. There was judgment below as prayed for, and defendant has appealed.

Max Levin was employed by the Golden Gate Liquor Company in the fall of 1934, as an auditor to install a set of books and subsequently to supervise the same on a basis of $50 per month. He was admitted to the bar in March, 1935, and conducted his legal and accounting business from the same office. In the early part of August, 1935, Morris R. Rosen and Herman Suffrin, the defendant herein, both of whom were large stockholders in the Golden Gate Liquor Company, desired…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barton v. State Bar of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Fenner, Henderson & Fenner v. Succession of McCanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  3. Titche v. HillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Lea v. HartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  5. Stumpf v. LopesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clements v. JungertIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Lyons v. HallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Levin v. SuffrinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API