Legal Opinion

Barton v. State Bar of Cal.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 13822PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The petitioner was charged by The State Bar of California with a violation of rule 2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct of The State Bar, approved by the Supreme Court of the state on May 24, 1928. Said rule reads as follows: “A member of The State Bar shall not solicit professional employment by advertisement or otherwise. This rule shall not apply to the publication or use of ordinary professional cards, or to conventional listings in legal directories.” (204 Cal. xci.)

In response to an order to show cause issued by The State Bar and served upon petitioner a hearing on said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State Bar of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. In Re Application of GalushaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. People ex rel. Maupin v. MacCabeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Proceedings Against Richards for DisbarmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Brotsky v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. MurrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  4. Amer. Trial Lawyers Assoc. v. NJ Supreme Ct.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. Fish v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API