Legal Opinion

United States v. David Ralph Linkenauger

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 30, 1966No. 16481PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is here on appeal from an order of the District Court denying appellant’s motion to correct sentence, filed under Rule 35 F.R.Cr.P.

Appellant was indicted by the grand jury on May 12, 1960, on a single count indictment charging him with transporting in interstate commerce a motor vehicle which he knew was stolen, in violation of Section 2312, Title 18, U.S.C. He appeared before the Court represented by counsel and entered a plea of guilty. The case was referred by the Court to the probation officer for presentence investigation. Thereafter he appeared before the Court for sentencing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Milanovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Roger R. Ploof and George J. GodinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. George Alvin TylerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. Paul Houston ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. Paul Houston ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. James G. NeighborsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API