Legal Opinion

Kulesza v. Wyhowski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1921No. Docket No. 78PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Vanderwerp (John), J. Case by Mike Kulesza against Felix Wyhowski and another for alleged misrepresentation and fraud. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The plaintiff sues to recover damages for alleged misrepresentation and fraud. The declara*190tion contains but one count. It alleges, in substance, that on November 25, 1317, the defendants did represent and pretend to plaintiff as true that the defendant Wyhowski was the owner of a valuable timber tract in the county of Muskegon and that if plaintiff would enter into an enterprise with them in taking timber from said land and put in a few hundred dollars he would realize therefrom in four or five months three to four thousand dollars profit; “that it was a sure thing and a good investment and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hedin v. Minneapolis Medical & Surgical InstituteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Myers v. Alpena Loan & Building Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graham v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Detroit & Security Trust Co. v. EchternkampMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API