Legal Opinion

Steiner v. Reading

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1941No. Appeals, 124-126PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

Clarence Steiner, William Brenner and William E. Widmyer, appellants, filed separate petitions in the court below, each asking that a writ of alternative mandamus issue against the City of Beading and the mayor and four councilmen, constituting the City Council of the City of Beading, appellees, directing that the petitioner therein be restored to the position of sanitary inspector in the Bureau of Health of the Department of Public Safety, from which he had been summarily removed by resolution of the city council, and that he be reimbursed for salary withheld…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCartney v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Palermo v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Crawford v. Clairton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Seltzer v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Soltis AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Schearer v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Seltzer v. ReadingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Healey v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Cornman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API