Cornman v. Philadelphia
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,
Two appeals have been taken from judgments in mandamus directing the reinstatement of two former Philadelphia County employes to the positions from which they alleged they had been. illegally dismissed. The City of Philadelphia was directed to reimburse plaintiffs for salaries found to have been unlawfully withheld, less money which they may have received during the period of improper dismissal. Counsel agreed that since the facts in each case were identical, the appeals should be argued together. The City states that these appeals: are test eases and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lennox v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Carrow v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Commonwealth ex rel. Bowman v. SliferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
- Commonwealth v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Walton v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gaul v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- McIlvaine v. McKettaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Mortimer v. Philadelphia Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Bernardi v. City of ScrantonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Cornman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.