Legal Opinion
Scholz Homes, Inc. v. Porterfield
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1971No. 70-159PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.
The issue raised is whether the Board of Tax Appeals’ decision was unreasonable or unlawful in determining that the purchase, rental and repairs to the fork-lift trucks here involved, did not fall within the exceptions of R. C. 5739.01(E) (2) and 5739.02(B) (18).
R. C. 5739.01(E) (2), defines “retail sale” and “sales at retail” as follows:
“(E) ‘Retail sale’ and ‘sales at retail’ include all sales except those in which the purpose of the consumer is:
í Í * # *
“(2) To incorporate the thing transferred as a material or a part, into tangible personal property to be pro-*70cluced for sale by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ace Steel Baling, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Mead Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- France Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Northwestern Ohio Poultry Ass'n v. SchneiderOhio Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by3 opinions
- Accel, Inc. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- Sims Bros. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Sims Bros., Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1998