Legal Opinion

Scholz Homes, Inc. v. Porterfield

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1971No. 70-159PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.

The issue raised is whether the Board of Tax Appeals’ decision was unreasonable or unlawful in determining that the purchase, rental and repairs to the fork-lift trucks here involved, did not fall within the exceptions of R. C. 5739.01(E) (2) and 5739.02(B) (18).

R. C. 5739.01(E) (2), defines “retail sale” and “sales at retail” as follows:

“(E) ‘Retail sale’ and ‘sales at retail’ include all sales except those in which the purpose of the consumer is:

í Í * # *

“(2) To incorporate the thing transferred as a material or a part, into tangible personal property to be pro-*70cluced for sale by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ace Steel Baling, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Mead Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. France Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Northwestern Ohio Poultry Ass'n v. SchneiderOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Accel, Inc. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Sims Bros. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Sims Bros., Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API