Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 23, 1976No. F-76-41PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BLISS, Judge:

Appellant, Timothy Carl Young, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in the Tulsa County District Court, Case No. CRF-75-811, for the offense of Burglary in the Second Degree, After Former Conviction of a Felony, in violation of 21 O.S.1971, § 1435. His punishment was fixed by jury at a term of imprisonment of one hundred (100) years. From this judgment and sentence defendant has perfected a timely appeal to this Court.

In the instant appeal, defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence upon which he was convicted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Danny Ray Lamb v. Lozier BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  2. Dean v. CrispCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. LaRue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Radcliff v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  5. Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sartin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. Day v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Day v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API