Legal Opinion
Radcliff v. Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 14, 1974No. Nos. 73-1520, 73-1550PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITEN STEIN, Circuit Judge.
The issue is the retroactivity of Lamb v. Brown, 10 Cir., 456 F.2d 18, which held that 10 Okl.St.Ann. § 1101 (Supp. 1969) was unconstitutional in that it violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Section 1101 allowed the benefits of juvenile court proceedings to females under the age of 18 years but limited those benefits to males under the age of 16 years. The opinion concluded with the statement that: “This ruling shall not apply retroactively.” Ibid, at 20.
We now have two habeas corpus cases each brought in the Northern District of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Bromley v. CrispCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Hooker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
- Raiford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Parks v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.