Legal Opinion

White v. Frink

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 1, 1962No. 3 Div. 23PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

This appeal is from a decree sustaining respondents’ demurrers to the bill of complaint, as amended,- and dismissing the bill.

Appellant sought a declaratory judgment holding unconstitutional Section 3 of Act 154, Acts of Alabama 1961, Voí. II, p. 2101, known as the Gaither Bill approved September 15, 1961, which provides:

“At the general election in November 1962, and every two years thereafter until the state, is redivided into congressional districts, the representatives in Congress shall be elected at large by the qualified • elector's' of the whole state, provided that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Jansen v. State Ex Rel. DowningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  3. Talton v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Evers v. City of DadevilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Birmingham Trust Nat'l Bank v. GarthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carey v. HowardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Moore v. MooreDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1964
  3. Fugazzoto v. Brookwood OneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Fugazzoto v. Brookwood OneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API