Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Gluting

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 1891No. 152Published

From the Whitley Circuit Court.

1Opinion

On Petition foe a Rehearing.

Reinhard, J. —

The appellant’s counsel, with much earnestness and evident sincerity, press upon us the favorable consideration of their petition for a rehearing, and insist that we reached an erroneous conclusion in affirming the judgment. It is claimed in the first place, that there is absolutely no evidence in the record from which the jury had a right to infer, legally, that the appellant’s husband, Abraham G. Barnett, when he employed the appellees to negotiate the sale of the property and agreed to pay them a commission therefor, had any authority from her…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Over v. SchifflingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AdamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Henry v. HeebIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Lichtenberger v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Sims v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API