Legal Opinion

Henry v. Heeb

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1888No. 13,204PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

This was a suit by Nicholas Heeb against- Henry Heeb, John F. Schonert and James D. Henry to recover the amount of two promissory notes signed by Heeb & Schonert, who were partners, as principals, and by James D. Henry as surety.

The controversy is between the plaintiff and the appellant Henry, and relates exclusively to the note described in the second paragraph of the complaint, the execution of which Henry denied under oath. To the denial of the latter, the plaintiff replied, in substance, that the defendant, after having obtained full knowledge that the plaintiff held the note in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. TuckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Commercial Bank of Buffalo v. . WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. Wellington v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  4. Hefner v. VandolahIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Williams v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis v. WannIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. CroneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Fay v. SlaughterIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Strader v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Barkley v. BarkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1914

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API