Legal Opinion
Carlsen v. Diehl
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 1922No. Civ. No. 4201PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■KERRIGAN, J.
This is an appeal by Thomas Carisen, plaintiff, from an order granting a new trial. The action was instituted by Carlsen to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him while engaged in loading a truck near the driveway of the entrance to what is known as the Oakland Harbor ferry. This ferry is used for the purpose of transporting vehicles and passengers across San Francisco Bay. The entrance on the western side of the bay is south of the ferry building in San Francisco, access to the ferrf slip being from East Street. On the left side of said drive leading to the slip…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Wallis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Dixon v. PlunsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Arnold v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal RailwaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lejeune v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Gritsch v. Pickwick Stages SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Rayner v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Bewley v. Western Creameries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Manuel v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.