Legal Opinion

National Rolling Mill Co. v. Heishman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1923No. 11,667PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Action by appellee, by her next friend, against appellant, wherein she seeks to recover damage's for injuries to her health by reason of her employment -by appellant while at an age prohibited by what is commonly known as the Factory Act, Acts 1899 p. 231, §8021 et seq. Burns 1914, and for certain other violations of the prohibitions of *674such act. Appellant relies for reversal upon the overruling of its motion for a new trial, presenting thereunder as the only error complained of the court’s action in giving instruction No. 9. This instruction is as follows: “If you find from a preponderance…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gifford v. Haynes Automobile Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Illinois Steel Company v. FullerIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Dalton Foundries, Inc. v. JefferiesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Dean v. Dalton Foundries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API