Legal Opinion · Dissent

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 7, 2016No. 2015-1171, 2015-1195, 2015-1994Published

1DissentReyna, Circuit Judge

The court should not have granted en banc review in this case. En banc review is disfavored and granted only when necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the court’s decisions or when thp proceeding involves a question of exceptional importance. Fed. R. App. Proc. 35(a); Missouri v. Jenkins, 495 U.S. 33, 46 n.14, 110 S.Ct. 1651, 109 L.Ed.2d 31 (1990). This case meets neither requirement. The en banc decision neither resolves a disagreement among the court’s decisions nor answers any exceptionally -important question.

Applying Rule 35, this court has found a variety of grounds to support…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Richard Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  4. Dsu Medical Corporation v. Jms Co., LtdCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. Missouri v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API