Legal Opinion
People v. Noriega
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 19, 1997No. B103392PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*314Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
A jury found appellant, Daniel Noriega, guilty of one count of shooting at an occupied vehicle. (Pen. Code, § 246.) He claims the trial court committed reversible error by granting his request to represent himself without adequate warnings as required by Faretta v. California (1975) 422 U.S. 806 [95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562]. In addition, he claims the trial court committed reversible error by relieving standby counsel in the absence of due process, and in denying his request for a continuance to prepare for trial. We conclude the court’s failure to properly advise…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. FryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. ConnersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. BushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.