People v. Conners
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COOPER, P. J —
SUMMARY
Wallace Conners was convicted of receiving stolen property and money laundering. He contends reversal is required because the trial court erred in allowing him to represent himself at trial without first advising him of the penal consequences of conviction; he was denied a fair sentencing hearing; and the trial court erred in failing to stay the sentence for receiving stolen property under Penal Code section 654. He further claims his convictions must be reversed because there was insufficient evidence he had knowledge of any criminal activity.
We affirm Conners’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. OsbandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. BushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. Fleming, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.