Legal Opinion

Gulden v. Berman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 28, 1950No. 33192PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

Ground one of the defendant’s amended motion for a new trial assigns as error the court’s direction of a verdict for overeharges dating from May 1, 1948, through August 4, 1949. The defendant contends that sec. 205 of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, limits all actions under the act for overcharges to those occurring during the one-year period immediately preceding the bringing of the action. The defendant’s contention is a correct one. Section 205 of the act reads in part: “Suit to recover such amount may be brought in any Federal, State or Territorial court of competent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whitley v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Bryant v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Foster & Kleiser, Inc. v. Coe & Payne Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Stonepecker, Inc. v. Shepherd Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Kaylor v. RominesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. Hart v. LeihyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1954
  5. Lee v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API