Legal Opinion
Foster & Kleiser, Inc. v. Coe & Payne Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 1, 1987No. 74448PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Judge.
Foster & Kleiser, Inc. (Foster) was granted interlocutory review from the denial of its motion for judgment on the pleadings, based on the alleged failure of Coe and Payne Company (Coe) to initiate suit on a lien within the twelve-month period after the debt became due as provided by OCGA § 44-14-361.1. Appellant and its affiliate, Foster and Kleiser, Corporation are both wholly owned subsidiaries of Metromedia, Inc., which entered into a contract for the construction of an office and plant facility with S & G Planning and Construction Company. Coe, a flooring company, was a…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Rich's, Inc. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- White v. AikenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Sam Finley, Inc. v. Interstate Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- A. H. Robins Co. v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Chamlee Lumber Co. v. CrichtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Health Horizons, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- L & W Supply Corp. v. Whaley Constr. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- COE & PAYNE COMPANY v. Foster & Kleiser, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1988
- Cook Sales, Inc. v. Concrete Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
- Foster & Kleiser, Inc. v. Coe & Payne Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.