Commonwealth v. Durham
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, President Judge:
This is an appeal from an adjudication of delinquency based upon charges of aggravated assault1 and possession of an instrument of crime.2 Appellant, who was nine years old at the time of the incident, contends that the lower court erred in refusing to take cognizance of the presumption of incapacity which arises when a child between the ages of seven and fourteen is alleged to have committed a criminal act. We agree and therefore reverse.
The testimony below, to which both parties stipulated, was that as the complainant, Delores Davis, was walking by, appellant kicked…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Commonwealth v. CropperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. Q.D.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. KocherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- In Re William A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- In re D.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- In re Tyvonne M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.