Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Durham

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1978No. 2366PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, President Judge:

This is an appeal from an adjudication of delinquency based upon charges of aggravated assault1 and possession of an instrument of crime.2 Appellant, who was nine years old at the time of the incident, contends that the lower court erred in refusing to take cognizance of the presumption of incapacity which arises when a child between the ages of seven and fourteen is alleged to have committed a criminal act. We agree and therefore reverse.

The testimony below, to which both parties stipulated, was that as the complainant, Delores Davis, was walking by, appellant kicked…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. CropperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. Q.D.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. KocherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. In Re William A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. In re D.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. In re Tyvonne M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API