State v. Q.D.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDimmick, J.
— Two juveniles appeal from separate adjudications which found that they had committed offenses which if committed by an adult would be crimes. The Court of Appeals, in these consolidated appeals, certified to this court the questions whether the statutory presumption of infant incapacity, RCW 9A.04.050,1 applies to juvenile *21adjudications, and if it does, what standard of proof is required to rebut the presumption. Each defendant argues that the trial court's determinations of capacity were erroneous under any standard. Appellant Q.D. additionally argues that there was insufficient evidence…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Dunner v. McLaughlinWashington Supreme Court · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- State v. SchaafWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. Shawn P.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. FurmanWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Erection Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. CurryWashington Supreme Court · 2000
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.