Legal Opinion
Julius M. Ames Co. v. Bostitch, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 8, 1965PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLEAN, District Judge.
This is a private antitrust action in which plaintiffs charge that defendant has violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 1) and Section 7 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 18). The two charges are not separately stated but are commingled in one count. Defendant moves under Rule 12(b) (6) to dismiss the Clayton Act charge on the ground that the complaint fails to state a claim. It also moves under Rule 56 for summary judgment dismissing the Sherman Act charge on the ground that it has no foundation in fact.
The allegations of the complaint may be summarized as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation v. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation and Hawaiian Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Cia. Petrolera Caribe, Inc. v. Arco Caribbean, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Louis E. Dailey, Jr. v. The Quality School Plan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Nbo Industries Treadway Companies, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation, in Nos. 74-2127, 75-1152 Appeal of Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., in No. 74-2128Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Callman Gottesman, Maria Mattiello, and Paul J. Peyser v. General Motors Corporation and E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company,defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.