Chugach Electric Association v. City of Anchorage
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CONNOR, Justice.
The factual aspects of this case are relatively simple and stand in stark contrast to the voluminous and far-reaching legal arguments which have been put forth by both parties.
Basically there is no dispute that the Park Lanes Bowling Alley was served with electrical power by the Anchorage City Utility Department, that the bowling alley requested Chugach Electric Association (hereafter referred to a Chugach) to provide service, that Chugach began constructing connecting lines to nearby, existing Chugach lines, and that the bowling alley is both within, the city limits and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- United Advertising Corp. v. Borough of RaritanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Kansas City v. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Heubeck v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Jefferson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Johnson v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.