Legal Opinion

Poulin v. Aquaboggan Waterslide

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 28, 1989PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

The plaintiffs, Mariette Poulin and her husband Jean-Paul Poulin,1 appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Androscoggin County, Brodrick, J.). A jury found no negligence on the part of the defendant, Aquaboggan Waterslide, for the back injury suffered by Mrs. Poulin as a result of using the defendant’s waterslide in Saco. On appeal, plaintiffs argue inter alia that the Superior Court erred in refusing to instruct on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. We agree and we vacate the judgment.

*926The facts presented at trial may be summarized as follows: Mrs. Poulin visited…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ginn v. Penobscot CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  2. Shea v. HernSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
  3. Hull v. L. & A. Montagnard Social Club, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ricci v. Alternative Energy Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  2. Varano v. JaborCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  3. Dyer v. Maine Drilling & Blasting, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  4. Moores v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2006
  5. Anderson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API