Moores v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiffs claim that a Sunbeam heating pad ignited an upholstered divan and caused a fire that burned down their house. Viewed in a light most favorable to the Plaintiffs, there is enough evidence the heating pad was defective to survive Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
I. Factual Background 1
The Plaintiffs, Gerry and Linda Moores, sustained significant property damage to their real and personal property at their Lubec, Maine home as a result of a fire on April 21, 2003. Def.’s Statement of Material Facts at ¶ 1…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Cadle Co. v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Gillen v. Fallon Ambulance Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Russell Violette v. Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc., Russell Violette v. Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Canning v. Broan-Nutone, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2007
- Estate of Pinkham v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Stinson v. Davol, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023