Legal Opinion

Moores v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided April 3, 2006No. CIV.05-94-B-WPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WOODCOCK, District Judge.

Plaintiffs claim that a Sunbeam heating pad ignited an upholstered divan and caused a fire that burned down their house. Viewed in a light most favorable to the Plaintiffs, there is enough evidence the heating pad was defective to survive Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

I. Factual Background 1

The Plaintiffs, Gerry and Linda Moores, sustained significant property damage to their real and personal property at their Lubec, Maine home as a result of a fire on April 21, 2003. Def.’s Statement of Material Facts at ¶ 1…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Cadle Co. v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Gillen v. Fallon Ambulance Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  5. Russell Violette v. Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc., Russell Violette v. Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Canning v. Broan-Nutone, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2007
  2. Estate of Pinkham v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  3. Stinson v. Davol, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API